James Webb Earliest Galexies images point toward confirming my IBBU universe hypothesis

See article

https://time.com/6269232/james-webb-telescope-oldest-galaxies/

I had good news recently. The astrophysicist found 6 new galaxies, bigger than the Milky Way, just 320 million years after the Big Bang!

Now that’s awesome in its own right and The Standard Theory (Einstein) is turned on its head.

Several year ago I hypothesised a central dark body and that we see only a fraction of the universe due to this IBBU (Infinite Black Body Universe) obscuring space.

See this link: http://www.georgewombwell.com/author/2011/07/29/hypothesis-alternative-view-of-the-universe/

Copyright Getty Images (fair usage and educational purposes)

As James Webb is a million miles from Earth, it can now see more space, be it just small increase. However, if I am right we could estimate the current size of the central body. If, as I claimed, the IBBU is expanding, it might also be possible to estimate this expansion rate (or contraction rate of course).

In any event I claim this as further evidence supporting my hypothesis.

Einstein’s Gravitational Waves: Another indication of the IBBU Universe

About five years ago I postulated a new view of the Universe: The IBBU Universe. See here

Today, scientists announced the detection of gravitational waves, Einstein’s outstanding theory from his major studies on gravity and the general theory of relativity. This is exciting stuff in its own right of course and congratulations to the teams that did the hard work to detect gravitational waves last year. It’s interesting they pinpoint a major interaction between two black holes as the cause. I would like to know how they did that.

What is does for the IBBU hypotheses I announed five years ago is that we now have a method that has every chance to find the black body source at the centre of our universe. This is because it would have immense effects on space time ripples and detecting the resulting gravitational waves suddenly became a definite possibility.

The IBBU Universe as postulated by HD in July 2011.

 

Read more on Gravitational Waves

The Largest Structure Ever Observed in the Universe

Reported this month is the discovery of the largest ‘structure’ in the universe.

A computer visualization of quasar cluster U1.27 or, more colloquially, Huge-LQG, the largest object ever identified in the universe (Roger G. Clowes)

This gives further support to HD’s hypothesis that the universe has a large central body – Infinite Black Body Universe (IBBU). This comes just a month or so after the publication of the largest black hole discovery. HD is feeling quite smug right this minute.

Read the report

HD

‘Largest Black Hole Discovered’ could be best proof of IBBU Universe Hypothesis

The journal Nature has recently reported the discovery of the largest black hole in the universe according to the Independant newspaper. This is excellent news for HD’s hypothesis that it is an infinite black body universe (IBBU)

The apparent fact that black holes can be so large (in this case is more than 11 times wider than the orbit of Neptune, the eighth planet in the Solar System) gives credence to the theory of the existence of a central body with similar properties to black holes, which I postulated in a post on Jul 29, 2011.

So-called sightings of black holes are inferred by their ability to prevent light from escaping their interior in the same way that the IBBU hypothesis allows for an infinite black body mass at the heart of the universe. This one may in fact be the IBBU recorded in a particular state and not just an echo of itself, as I prefer to refer to the appearance of other black holes across the whole universe. More work needs completing on this observation to determine whether it is in an expanding or contracting phase. Finding evidence that the so-called black hole works independently of the galaxy in which it is supposed to reside, will be further evidence of the existence of the Infinite Black Body Universe.

HD

Higgs Boson: The search goes on but the scientists have it wrong

Today’s news from CERN that the Higgs Boson may exist given their findings from their two experiments ATLAS and CMS have indicated the same. The findings are as elegant as the presentations they make about them and not withstanding the expense to get thus far, it looks bright for particle physicists in the years to come.

However, as all particle physicists know, Higgs Bosons do NOT account for gravity, therefore their assertion that this news is quite possibly the most startling ‘in their lifetimes’ is both brash and hollow at the same time. Brash because it will provide the oxygen for further funding requests and hollow since it proves very little about the real universe.

HD has already given their alternative universe hypothesis this time last year. The ‘Infinite Black Body Universe’ or IBBU principle that relates all bodies whether infinitesimally large or infinitesimally small, are handled in exactly the same way and are all subject to the laws of gravity. Therefore today’s announcement leaves the scientific community in exactly the same place as they were yesterday: no idea how to explain gravity and no nearer to explaining the existence of the universe despite what they might tell you. Particle physicists take note!

Smallest distance between objects




Question posed today elsewhere:
'…What's the smallest distance between two objects before they touch?…'
HD's proposition:
It's a really good question Jim!
If you assume that the smallest distance between two objects is a straight line and the line is made up of infinitesimal 'bits' and where these 'bits' are the smallest particles that can exist in the universe it might be stated that they are not touching when the line's bits=2 between the objects. Therefore if you measure each bit in terms of length and multiply by 2 that is the smallest measurable length between the objects. It cannot be reduced to 1 bit only, since one bit cannot be a line, it can only be the smallest bit of a line.
Theoretically, it might be stated as the width of the smallest particle that makes up the atomic structure since atoms are in fact transparent to some particles. I.e radiation. Measuring that may be difficult unless you place two objects that do not appear transparent to these particles next to each other and wait till the particles cannot transmit across the gap.
Practically not possible. Read about Schrödinger's Cat where it is either alive or dead, but is only one or the other when one can actually measure it. At all other times it is either alive or dead but remains hidden.
The assumption that the smallest distance between two points, however, is also not provable outside of mathematics. It might be that the smallest distance is in fact measured by some other entity which may not be straight in the ordinary sense of the word. Lines are assumed to be straight but it may not be the case. If they are made up of 'bits' as stated above, there is a reliance on the 'bits' being adjacent to each other at all times and that there is no 'gap' between bit ends.
The question that could be asked is are there distinct objects or are all objects just transient, transferable and fusible with other objects?
It may also be that the distance between two objects may be different in space than as measured on earth!
HD